
Timeline
Feburary - May 2026
Role
Accessibility Researcher
Prototype Facilitator
Responsibilities
Research
(Data Finding & Synthesis)
Accessibility Framework
(Propose the availability of accessibility both content navigation measurements)
Prototyping
(Guide Tour Design & Iterations)
Disciplines
Accessibility Design
Speculative Design
Information Science
Tools
Google Doc
Figma
Figjam
Methods
Literature Review
Lived Experience Review
Video Demo Review
Related Work Study
Prototyping
Teammate
Sandra Ye
(Project Manager & Content Design Lead)
Claire Jen
(Navigation Prototype Facilitator & Design Deliverable Lead)
Keertana Gunnam
(Navigation Design Lead & Researcher)
Advisor
Prof. Rahaf Alharbi
Associated with

Positive Exposure & Art 75
Center of Digital Experience
at Pratt Institute

Project Highlights
Overview
Designing a Gallery Experience for BLV Visitors’ Autonomy
"How might we design a gallery experience that supports BLV visitors’ autonomy, while allowing them to co-construct their own art journey? "
In many gallery settings, accessibility support often centers on one-way information delivery, such as pre-recorded audio guides or fixed descriptions. While these resources can be helpful, they may offer limited flexibility for visitors who want to choose their own pace, ask questions, compare interpretations, or form personal and emotional connections with artworks. Research on blind visual arts experiences emphasizes that access involves not only receiving visual information, but also navigating the venue, engaging socially, and making meaning through personal memory, imagination, and discussion. (Li et al., 2023; Ahmetovic et al., 2016; Kamikubo et al., 2020)
In this project, we reframed accessibility as supported autonomy: not about asking BLV visitors to do everything alone, but about creating predictable, flexible, and supportive conditions where they can decide how they want to explore, understand, and participate. (Bennett et al., 2018)
Outcome Preview
A11y Measurement Framework for Content Discovery and Spatial Navigation
The outcome of this project is an A11y Measurement Framework that helps evaluate whether a gallery experience supports BLV visitors before, during, and after they engage with artworks.
Instead of measuring accessibility only by whether an audio guide or description exists, our framework looks at two connected parts of the gallery journey:

Content Access: How artwork information is described, layered, and personalized.

Navigation Apporach: Building Environmental Knowledge Before Movement.
The True Story Behind this Project

The Case Study Author
Yung-Wei Chen
Something I wanna share before you dive into my research story…

Background & Why A11y Matters
Accessibility as a Way to Belong, Expands, and Equality
Positive Exposure promotes a more equitable and compassionate world through photography, film, storytelling, education, and advocacy. Its mission shaped our project direction: if the gallery celebrates human diversity, the visitor experience should also support diverse ways of perceiving, navigating, and connecting with art.

Art Access Should Be an Equal Invitation

A11y Expands the Experience for Everyone

What do I mean Accessibility?
Supporting BLV Visitors’ Autonomy Across Content, Space, and Participation
In this project, accessibility means supporting Blind and Low Vision visitors’ autonomy in gallery spaces. The meaning of autonomy does not equal to experience the gallery completely alone. It means having the ability to choose how to access artwork information, how to move through the space, when to seek support, and how to form personal interpretations.
At the same time, no visitor experiences a gallery in complete independence. People rely on labels, maps, lighting, spatial cues, staff, companions, and digital tools to understand where they are and what they are seeing. (Bennett et al., 2018) This is why I frame autonomy as something supported by interdependence: a relationship between the visitor, the environment, the technology, and the people around them.

Persona & The Who is the A11y for
Designing for a Spectrum of BLV Art Experiences: Meet the Story of Elize and Jay

“I still connect with art visually, but I need time, contrast, and control to understand what I’m looking at.”










“I don’t need to see the artwork the same way others do. I need enough structure to build my own understanding.”










Design Value & A11y Principle
Translate BLV Research Into Content and Navigation Decisions

01
Autonomy Through Choice

Design principle
Give visitors control over pace, depth, sequence, and interpretation.

02
Predictability Builds Confidence

Design principle
Use repeatable patterns, clear labels, consistent navigation language, and predictable interaction flows.

03
Spatial Understanding Before Movement

Design principle
Help visitors build a mental map before asking them to move.

04
Clear Language Is Part of Accessibility

Design principle
Use precise, contextual descriptions that support orientation, imagination, and decision-making.

Synthesis
From Research Insight to Design Direction: What We Learned, and How It Shaped the A11y Framework
To make the research usable for design, we organized the key insights into direct design directions. This section shows how each finding shaped the accessibility framework and later informed our prototype decisions.


Research / Audit Insight
BLV visitors have different vision levels, visual memories, and tactile familiarity.

Design Direction / Content Approach
Design flexible content options instead of one universal access mode.


Research / Audit Insight
Audio guides often provide fixed, one-way narration.

Design Direction / Content Approach
Create layered content that visitors can enter at different depths.


Research / Audit Insight
Artwork descriptions may be too subjective, too shallow, or designed for sighted visitors.

Design Direction / Content Approach
Separate objective visual description, context, interpretation, and reflection.


Research / Audit Insight
Gallery navigation often relies on visual signs, landmarks, and spatial assumptions.

Design Direction / Navigation Apporach
Provide room previews, artwork locations, and spatial cues before movement.


Research / Audit Insight
Navigation tools can struggle with indoor accuracy, noisy environments, or missing environmental knowledge.

Design Direction / Navigation Apporach
Design navigation as supportive orientation, not full replacement of mobility tools.


Research / Audit Insight
BLV visitors may rely on companions, staff, or remote guides, but quality varies.

Design Direction / Navigation Apporach
Make key information more structured, repeatable, and available through the system.

Key Design Break Down
Choose Your Journey - Flexible Entry Points for Different Gallery Goals

Layered Access to Artwork Content - From One-Way Description to Active Discovery







Coordinated Audio, Text, and Image Support - Multiple Formats Without Overloading the Visitor







Spatial Preview Before Movement - Building Understanding Before Asking Visitors to Navigate

Real-Time Navigation with Contextual Cues - Replacing Visual Landmarks with Understandable Spatial Language






Personalization Profile - Remembering Preferences Across the Visit


Reflection
Accessibility Is Not Just More Features, It Is the Condition for Visitor Choice
This project helped me understand that accessibility is not only about adding more features. It is about designing the conditions for visitors to make choices: how they access information, how they understand space, and how they participate in the gallery experience.
For me, the most important shift was moving from “providing access” to supporting atonomy A meaningful BLV gallery experience should not depend on one fixed audio guide, one staff member, or one route through the space. It should offer flexible, predictable, and respectful support that allows visitors to build their own relationship with the artwork.

Limitations
The Framework Needs Real-World Validation Before Implementation
This project is research-informed, but not yet fully validated in practice. Because of time and resource constraints, we relied on secondary research, product audits, online BLV community materials, and analysis of existing accessibility tools. These sources gave us strong design directions, but the framework and prototype still need direct feedback from BLV visitors through co-design, usability testing, and live gallery observation.

Validation With BLV Visitors

Technical Testing in the Gallery Environment

The Future
Moving From Prototype to Practice Requires Co-Design, Staff Workflow, and Content Infrastructure
The most important next step would be co-design and live testing with BLV visitors. Their feedback would help evaluate whether the content layers are understandable, whether the navigation language supports orientation, and whether the experience truly supports autonomy in the gallery.
Future work should also involve collaboration with Positive Exposure’s staff and technical team, especially around content management. For the framework to move beyond prototype, the gallery would need a sustainable way to managing the system, which include upload artwork descriptions, transcripts, spatial tags, accessibility metadata, and route information as part of its regular exhibition workflow.



